Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Next revision
Previous revision
public:loadedtestcases:tc2 [2012/09/12 09:04] – created andreaspublic:loadedtestcases:tc2 [2019/02/12 09:04] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1
Line 10: Line 10:
 ====NGSGAPS==== ====NGSGAPS====
 ==Test Case Class== ==Test Case Class==
-====Animalss====+====Plants (Animals)====
 ==Contact person== ==Contact person==
 ====nd==== ====nd====
Line 30: Line 30:
 Project should focus on the generation of software that first of all allows for a rapid assessment of the quality of the sequence data. New ways for mapping short reads to a reference genome should be designed, allowing for more flexible gap options, variable assembling parameters that rely on the local context of the genomic region and iterative read mapping. Project should focus on the generation of software that first of all allows for a rapid assessment of the quality of the sequence data. New ways for mapping short reads to a reference genome should be designed, allowing for more flexible gap options, variable assembling parameters that rely on the local context of the genomic region and iterative read mapping.
 ==Discussion== ==Discussion==
-nd+LF: identifying large structural variations with unfinished genomes is rather difficult. What is possible is to remap the paired-end or better the mate-pair reads and use that information. There are a number of tools able to do that: breakdancer, Hydra, GASV, Tigra-SV, Delly. Perhaps a general assessment of these tools should be a first step of the project. We could invite the developers of those tools. 
 +Ken Chen, Aaron Quinlan, gasv@cs.brown.edu, Tobias Rausch from EMBL would probably the best. 
 + 
public/loadedtestcases/tc2.1347440667.txt.gz · Last modified: 2019/02/12 09:04 (external edit)
Trace: